Baku: The ‘Two-State Principle’ in resolving the Palestinian issue is considered the most realistic and legitimate model within the framework of international law and UN resolutions. Azerbaijan has consistently supported this position, recognizing Palestine in the 1990s and establishing diplomatic relations with it. This step reflects Azerbaijan’s principled position in its approach to resolving the conflict and its commitment to solutions based on international law. Azerbaijan’s steps in this direction were earlier and more consistent than those of other countries that later adopted the same position.
According to Azeri-Press News Agency, recent days have seen the consecutive recognition of Palestine’s statehood by various countries, drawing significant attention. This process may lead to the formation of a new dynamic in the international community regarding the resolution of the conflict. While the recognition of Palestine is seen as political support and a call for conflict resolution based on international law, it may also complicate Israel’s position, making it more difficult to find a balanced solution in negotiations. Thus, while expanding negotiation possibilities, it may also create additional tension between the parties.
Israel’s security concerns should also be considered in discussions, given the fragmented political structure of the Palestinian side. The weakness of the institutional capabilities of the Mahmoud Abbas Administration and the exclusion of Hamas and various armed groups from legitimate political processes complicates negotiations. This situation necessitates acknowledging Israel’s security arguments.
The position of the United States is a major factor influencing the future trajectory of the conflict. Presently, Washington has not proposed a concrete plan for a long-term solution to the Gaza crisis. However, considering the U.S.’s regional influence and strategic partnership with Israel, its political will is crucial for real results. Other international actors, including the European Union, the United Kingdom, and France, have expressed principled support for conflict resolution, but practical mechanisms remain undeveloped.
The humanitarian aspect is also critical in conflict resolution. The release of hostages and protection of civilians are key factors in legitimizing the process. While the return of hostages can reduce short-term tensions, a long-term solution requires political institutionalization and security guarantees. The civilian population suffers the most from the conflict, making the development of sustainable peace mechanisms to ensure the safety of affected women, children, and innocents a priority for the international community. Political will, regional cooperation, and approaches based on international law are necessary for a lasting solution.
Remzi ‚¬Å¡¬€¦¡¬€š¬¦¡¬€š¬…¡¬¦¡¬€š¬…¡¬‚¬¦¡¬¦¡¬€š¬…¡¬‚¬¦¡¬‚¬Å¡¬¦¡¬¦¡¬€š¬…¡¬‚¬¦¡¬‚¬Å¡¬¦¡¬‚¬Å¡¬€¦¡¬¦¡¬¦¡¬¡etin, a foreign policy expert from Trkiye specializing in Israel, told APA that recognizing Palestine as a state is an important step with potential positive impacts on conflict resolution. He noted that the Palestinian issue remains one of the most sensitive topics on the international agenda. After events on October 7, Israel’s military actions in Gaza and the resulting deaths have turned the problem into a global ‘test of human conscience.’ Against this backdrop, many states, including previous Western supporters of Israel, have recognized Palestine’s independence. The recognition, though belated, is seen as pivotal for regional stability. The ‘two-state principle’ is a widely accepted model for conflict resolution, but Israel’s current radical right-wing government opposes it. With Israel recognizing Jerusalem as its ‘eternal and indivisible capital’ since 1980, and not backing down, the West’s recognition
of Palestine raises serious concerns for Israel, prompting new annexation discussions by the Tel Aviv government.
According to the political expert on Israel, Western countries are attempting to balance their past unilateral support for Israel by recognizing Palestine. Concurrently, Israel’s international isolation is deepening, with declining support in UN General Assembly votes. However, Palestinian internal division complicates conflict resolution. The dual administration of the Mahmoud Abbas Administration in Ramallah and Hamas in Gaza, each with its own political agenda, limits the potential for a unified Palestinian leadership and real partnership in negotiations. Without a common position between the West Bank and Gaza leadership, even after massive casualties, this division continues to bolster Israel’s position.